Eremes Guile.1480

changed the title :3 please keep it positive <3

hi anet, please give anvil rock 3 links or more they need more, thank you <3

ping issue in eu? y'all playing counter strike or something? LAUL

just stack on one server, fighting sentries and doors. lol.

It's not tanking, people just don't play the game because it's not fun in its current state. Do you not see that? Nobody wants to have to poke T3 BG structures to get even the slightest semblance of a "fight". Which turns out being sitting in siege and getting clouded by 30 pugs for 15 minutes until a tag comes by with another 20+ to wipe you. So what you're saying is that the other servers in T1 should just grin and bear it getting blobbed by superior numbers? Why? How about BG changes its ways? You heavily implied that the responsibility is on the players because they don't "choose" to play. Please look in the mirror and realize how much this server is hurting the entire game mode. Yeap, just like SOS, and Kaineng, when they beat BG only to implode. So next plan is to beat BG, and implode after a few weeks. And BG re-gain the t1 spot again and all the server implode again, and all the fight guilds quit again, log in to the forums and cry "LOOK MAA BG IS BLOBBING AGAIN". Rinse and repeat. This game is old af, you won't be getting any more fresh blood. Guild's are done with this game and have moved on. If you're still trying to beat x server, maybe you should re-consider spending your gaming time wisely.

That is not an absolute number, but depends on the opponents you have, e.g. Elona dominates T5, but lost T4.Using play-hours in fact makes sense, as play-hour differences ARE the main reason to dominate or get dominated. Linking based on population in fact works quite well, but as long as the transfer system is not fixed, it only works for one week, then people stack together on the selected winner to get easier wins. Equal player-hours does not mean equal competition. Please explain BG's now 43-0-0 skirmish record this match as being "competitive" Coaxing the other servers out to play is more the issue. And yes, BG shouldn’t have opened. The new devs haven’t seen the issue. Left it on autopilot. But the only reason why it’s 43-0-0 is because the other servers aren’t playing. Again. It’s their choice. FC+jq tried for a couple of weeksAfter banging heads against T3 Walls, ac's and double numbers who defend a tower like its their own LIFE. I mean Lets face ITAlot of us been through that after puberty do you expect milk and cookies when taking a fully defended objectives? lol Naah, i Just dont like to ktrain 15 hrs in a row Everyone its own thing i guess So.., everyone is defending but it’s a ktrain? How does that work?yeah defending a keep is a k-train?????

That is not an absolute number, but depends on the opponents you have, e.g. Elona dominates T5, but lost T4.Using play-hours in fact makes sense, as play-hour differences ARE the main reason to dominate or get dominated. Linking based on population in fact works quite well, but as long as the transfer system is not fixed, it only works for one week, then people stack together on the selected winner to get easier wins. Equal player-hours does not mean equal competition. Please explain BG's now 43-0-0 skirmish record this match as being "competitive" Coaxing the other servers out to play is more the issue. And yes, BG shouldn’t have opened. The new devs haven’t seen the issue. Left it on autopilot. But the only reason why it’s 43-0-0 is because the other servers aren’t playing. Again. It’s their choice. FC+jq tried for a couple of weeksAfter banging heads against T3 Walls, ac's and double numbers who defend a tower like its their own LIFE. I mean Lets face ITAlot of us been through that after puberty do you expect milk and cookies when taking a fully defended objectives? lol Naah, i Just dont like to ktrain 15 hrs in a row Everyone its own thing i guesswhat? lol

That is not an absolute number, but depends on the opponents you have, e.g. Elona dominates T5, but lost T4.Using play-hours in fact makes sense, as play-hour differences ARE the main reason to dominate or get dominated. Linking based on population in fact works quite well, but as long as the transfer system is not fixed, it only works for one week, then people stack together on the selected winner to get easier wins. Equal player-hours does not mean equal competition. Please explain BG's now 43-0-0 skirmish record this match as being "competitive" Coaxing the other servers out to play is more the issue. And yes, BG shouldn’t have opened. The new devs haven’t seen the issue. Left it on autopilot. But the only reason why it’s 43-0-0 is because the other servers aren’t playing. Again. It’s their choice. FC+jq tried for a couple of weeksAfter banging heads against T3 Walls, ac's and double numbers who defend a tower like its their own LIFE. I mean Lets face ITAlot of us been through that after pubertydo you expect milk and cookies when taking a fully defended objectives? lol

It's true, everything is done for a fighting purpose; however, many of these fight guilds, and/or GvG'ers behavior has been completely counterproductive to the goal. If WvW is to get new people, these guilds/commanders, can't be off tagless, or silent tagging, doing their own thing on a map against another group. For starters, it takes up unnecessary map spots, but secondly, why would any potential new WvW'er have any incentive to remain in WvW when they log on and see no real activity? Then we have the issue of these fight guilds constantly hopping servers, then destroying each server they moved to. It completely turns off the pugs (or again new potential WvW'ers). People wonder why BG can't be beat; they have a very large pug population that's been there from the beginning. Where exactly is the pug population of the other servers? I reckon they got fed up with guilds moving to their servers, pillaging them, moving up in Tiers they couldn't handle, then gave up. We probably could take the rest of the servers in NA, put them up against BG, and they'd still lose because they don't have the pugs, even despite, having far more guilds. Which brings me to the next point; None of these fight guilds/GvG'ers never learned to adapt. Truth be told, that trash melee ball, leap in and swing like a madman back in the core days actually got countered months prior to HoT's release. So these guilds that were once self-proclaimed great, were getting absolutely destroyed by smaller groups. Then HoT hit which amplified the problem further, then PoF even more-so. It came to the point that if any guild group attempted this old style got destroyed, hence the whining on the forums, and hence the "please bring back the core days play style". All these guilds needed to do was adapt, simple as that, but instead wanted Anet to bend the game back to that low-skill trash melee meta. Which then brings me to my next point If these guilds were so hell bent on fights (and think they're so good), they would simply break into towers or keeps regardless of how fortified or sieged up they were, and kill the enemy and/or farm them. The truth is, they can't do it, because they aren't good enough, because they never learned to actually adapt. So their raids are basically limited to flipping paper towers, and getting wiped on the battlefield by smaller numbers. I could sit here and list many of these guilds who quit awhile ago, those who quit recently, and those still active that fall under this category. Truth is, it's these fight guilds and their GvG behavior is what's destroyed WvW, not Anet. They could have easily learned to adapt as to remain competitive instead of being beaten like drums by pugs. maybe these fight guilds were expecting pugs to serve them milk and cookies..

System of a down - Toxicity Conversion, software version 7.0Looking at life through the eyes of a tired hubEating seeds as a pastime activityThe toxicity of our city, our cityYou, what do you own the world?How do you own disorder, disorderNow somewhere between the sacred silenceSacred silence and sleepSomewhere, between the sacred silence and sleepDisorder, disorder, disorderMore wood for the fires, loud neighborsFlashlight reveries caught in the headlights of a truckEating seeds as a pastime activityThe toxicity of our city, of our cityNow, what do you own the world?How do you own disorder, disorderNow somewhere between the sacred silenceSacred silence and sleepSomewhere between the sacred silence and sleepDisorder, disorder, disorderNow, what do you own the world?How do you own disorder, disorderNow somewhere between the sacred silenceSacred silence and sleepSomewhere, between the sacred silence and sleepDisorder, disorder, disorderWhen I became the sunI shone life into the man's heartsWhen I became the sunI shone life into the man's hearts

Blackgate is A reason NA is dying but not because they are stacked or are better. Simply put, not enough people want to organize a server to do what it would take to take down Blackgate. A handful of servers have stacked and pushed Blackgate into hibernation, then that server realizes they don't actually care about 1st and start to destack. Blackgate comes out of hibernation and its back to business as usual. Its part of the fundamental problem with WvW. How is WvW supposed to be played? Why is my 20 man group more right than cookies map queue? Were cookies players better then yours or is it just a failure to adapt? Because "fun"? Who defines fun? Want Blackgate to die? Stack 3 servers and 2v1 them for the next 6 mouths. The fair weathers will leave and there isn't very many "server pride" people left. If 6 months isn't long enough, keep going...Blackgate has been doing it since ~2012. yeah and make sure you quit your irl job too, cause you're gonna need to do it 24/7!

BG never open field fights? LOL The guy you're quoting is 100% right though.BG only "open fields" near t3 objectives where they have siege on walls and objective auras.Oh and of course numbers advantage. The full 2 months when we were hardstuck in T1 (a few months ago), only time we'd ever get a real open field fight is when BG has more numbers... That is precisely why no one wants to deal with BG. I really wish we had a week with no ACs, BG would drop out of T1 in a heart beat cause they wouldn't be able to hold any objective.And why would you wanna fight these bg near sieged up keep/tower?

Most people hate BG because of their playstyle. The server that cares the most about PPT is obviously BG...I mean come on. Against BG, you can only get a fight with them if you attack their sieged up, tiered up objectives. At which point they will blob you down with 40+ then never even leave the objective afterward for open field fights. It's the best way to "win" but it's incredibly boring only fighting the "#1 server" when they have every advantage under the sun. Numbers, objective auras, tactivators, siege, etc. With cookie gone, there's not even anybody to fight anymore. Sorry but some BG people seem straight up delusional if they really can't see this. BG never open field fights? LOL

so people are angry at bg because they can't win the PPT game? is PPT even still a thing? do we care about PPT or fights? which one is it? so what if BG one day falls apart and drop to the bottom tier, will the new t1 champion be hated too? lol

you could always have a go at fortnite, and try win 3 million dollars /shrug