noNo reason? Then yes. My reasoning here is as "good" as his (which is "none", to make it absolutely clear). So still no.Of course yes. And his "reasoning" is still better than yours (which is none). noSame as above - yes. Same as above -still no.Still yes. * Not needed, would make it a direct upgrade over raptorPlaying the game is also not needed, so why do you play it? And what is the problem with being a direct upgrade over the raptor (which it wouldn't really be, raptors can jump over ravines easier than jackals, due to their slight altitude increase) ? See, this time I gave you the reasoning and all you came up with is... this? "you don't need to play the game"? It's not even relevant to what I wrote in the slightest. I guess you just want to find someone to argue with despite having nothing to say. :+1:What is wrong with it? The fact that they're not making other mounts worthless by releasing new ones. Because making each mount unique and useful in it's own way is a great concept and it should definitely stay this way."This" is showing you you didn't make any argument at all, actually. "Nothing to say" also applies to you here, it's you who game me the idea. True that its usefulness fell off after skyscale release, but it's still a faster 'hill climber'.He didn't say the springer is not the faster hill climber, he said to buff it. And I said there's no need to, because it's still useful. What's your point here?My point is that he didn't bring up "being the fastest climber". Nah, still definitely not. But great non-constructive necroing for your first post. Welcome, I guess. :lol:I'm afraid the ArenaNet team is the one to decide this, definitely not you :)Define "necroing", I don't find this word in the dictionary. Also, first post, but not first day in the game.Thank you for the welcone :)
noNo reason? Then yes. My reasoning here is as "good" as his (which is "none", to make it absolutely clear). So still no.Of course yes. And his "reasoning" is still better than yours (which is none). noSame as above - yes. Same as above -still no.Still yes. * Not needed, would make it a direct upgrade over raptorPlaying the game is also not needed, so why do you play it? And what is the problem with being a direct upgrade over the raptor (which it wouldn't really be, raptors can jump over ravines easier than jackals, due to their slight altitude increase) ? See, this time I gave you the reasoning and all you came up with is... this? "you don't need to play the game"? It's not even relevant to what I wrote in the slightest. I guess you just want to find someone to argue with despite having nothing to say. :+1:What is wrong with it? The fact that they're not making other mounts worthless by releasing new ones. Because making each mount unique and useful in it's own way is a great concept and it should definitely stay this way."This" is showing you you didn't make any argument at all, actually. "Nothing to say" also applies to you here, it's you who game me the idea. True that its usefulness fell off after skyscale release, but it's still a faster 'hill climber'.He didn't say the springer is not the faster hill climber, he said to buff it. And I said there's no need to, because it's still useful. What's your point here?My point is that he didn't bring up "being the fastest climber". Nah, still definitely not. But great non-constructive necroing for your first post. Welcome, I guess. :lol:I'm afraid the ArenaNet team is the one to decide this, definitely not you :)Define "necroing", I don't find this word in the dictionary. Also, first post, but not first day in the game.Thank you for the welcone :)
