Blodeuyn.2751

Mount stomp is the only thing I like about the mount. I don't know why it amuses me so much, but it does. Beef it up I say! Otherwise just remove mounts altogether, I am overall unimpressed with them.

The fact that Anet would even consider a mount rental system just amplifies the fact mounts should never have been implemented in the first place. Poor planning, no testing, no "stupid-proofing", no foresight.

I vote for never, though I think the game is too old and too far gone for Alliances to matter now. All we seem to have left are karma trains and easy-mode clusterfucks.

Because under the new system it wouldn't make sense to have more than one alliance. Each link will bring a new mix of alliances and the whole purpose is to use this to make balanced matches. Having more than one alliance per person would skew the metric for balance.

After finally running through a chunk of PoF I can wholeheartedly say NO. There is absolutely no need for mounts in wvw.

This is my concern. I moved to a T4ish server to fit my playing preference. Will the new system take that choice away and force me to be on blobby worlds? Also, there are guilds I do NOT want to end up with, along with certain individuals. Will we be forced to play with those we have paid to get away from?Yes. Isnt that the point? Instead of huge vs big vs small server in matchups you will now be "forced" to play big vs roughly as big vs maybe slightly less big. Even if you previously joined a small server for that playstyle. Thats the cost of "balance". Its one that you are going to have to pay whether you like it or not. Sorry. Most will argue its worth it.I'll have to wait and see how it works out, but I don't like the idea of being forced to play "big". It could be fun or it could be a disaster overall for Anet. As the saying goes, better is not better for everyone.

This is my concern. I moved to a T4ish server to fit my playing preference. Will the new system take that choice away and force me to be on blobby worlds? Also, there are guilds I do NOT want to end up with, along with certain individuals. Will we be forced to play with those we have paid to get away from?

I hope the cap is high enough that my small guild is not penalised. We should not have to throw away our name so we can play with the server we have come to love. I'm sure there are many others who feel the same way.

I haven't read all 11 pages of this thread yet, but please, please, please add QOP to the TC alliance so that we may follow you all to the new system. We don't want to be with anyone else. <3

The problems I am having with DPI scaling: Resolution: 3840 x 2160 with the UI set to SmallSystem: Windows 10, GTX 1080 Founders Edition, Samsung 23.6-Inch UHD-QHD MonitorClient: 64-bit Issues: Many windows (such as Friends, Guild, Inventory, Trading Post, Mail, WvW info window ) are about 15-20% larger than they "should" be.The mouse cursor is about 15-20% too large as well.All text is too large which makes it appear to have anti-aliasing issues. I think this is what people are describing as blurry text.The mini map, chat window, and skill bar are a good size, so no issues there for me. Maybe the best way to describe my issue is that prior to DPI scaling, we needed an option to set the UI to Extra Large. Now it feels like we need an Extra Small option.

Location: WvW Alpine borderlands (green and blue), Garrison keep, southeast outer gate, supply depot wall.Issue: Wall textures pop in and out and flicker. On a fully upgraded T3 keep you will see textures for T1, T2, and T3 walls.Race: SylvariSex: FemaleProfession: Elementalist

They have a blue glowing eye mask as well: https://wiki.guildwars2.com/wiki/Glint%27s_Gaze_Mask

Desire: Zodiac Shield Skin. I know this is an extremely tough one, as it is so rare now!Server: NA

Please bring back the Storm Bow for Halloween!

They had something similar to this in Aion. They called them kisks and you could bind to them for 1 hour, then they were destroyed.