Omar Aschi Popp.7496

This Even though I staunchly oppose you in this, I thumbs upped you. Although ape reactions do tend to get noticed faster... oh boy.

You guys are talking about a group of people who tried to sneak in privateer weapons and then was like "ohjhh, oh no we're not doing it like this, this is a one time thing to show you something special!". Until I see internal memos detailing that in writing before they released it, I will not believe it was anything but backpedaling and saving face after being caught. Are you guys legitimate like unawares that this is standard procedure? Don't be naiive. Also Anet has done nothing wrong here. Truly we are to blame for showing them, by the numbers, that we love gambling. STOP BLAMING ANET

Yes, Chimmichanga...that's...it's so perfect for the Viscount. Next time I'm in the Lab, I'll run around saying "Oh noes, Viscount Chimmichanga is here" and the name will go down in history. Thank you, I have a purpose now :) Just as bullshit as "steve". Nice sarcasm.

Holy fuck motherfucker.Thats good.

You're killing fictional monsters, that look like Holloween toys, in an extra dimensional realm, governed by a Murderous Mad King, with a terrible sense of humor, arguing with his estranged Son, who is also murderous but with less humor, opening disemboded doors, mining big candy corns for little candy corns, and collecting trick or treat bags........ There is nothing NORMAL about anyone who would willingly visit this place. Mad Kings is funny. What are you talking about.Him and Hohotron are what make gw2 Also thumbsup

Here is my question. Why are we arbitrarily picking named enemies to nickname? Why not call Tequatl "John"?Why not Call Logan "Abernathy"?Why not call The Viscount "Chimmichanga"? For what non attention-seeking purpose are we naming a skeketon "Steve/Dave/(lol)Fred"?!!!!! Just call him Horror like a normal person. OrbitalButt was spot on.

All I want is a Ghastly Grinning Shield. Not because its worth lots but because I am an idiot and made bad choices that screwed me out of it on several occasions.. Please find it in your halloweenie hearts. I will give virtual smooches. Tempest Sword skin - RECIEVED This is gonna sound retarded to you guys but I do not use TP to buy and play exclusively on drop reliance. Thank you

I have heard Steve since 2013, but only in forums. Never in game. Is the point of this thread aknowledgement?

Please... The effects in this game are quite mild. Have you tried D3? If that's Diablo 3, no I have not. Other than GW2 I've only tried Guild Wars, Tabula Rasa, Last Chaos, WoW, Diablo 2, Torchlight, Rappelz, ToR, AoC, TSW, ESO, RoM, Tera, Rift, NWO, LotRO, Skyforge. Aion, CoX and Wildstar. While GW2 is superior to a lot of those games in one way or another, I never had trouble seeing a boss in any of them. The effects in GW2 may seem mild to you. That may be due to your being exposed to games where they are more intense. Maybe the difference in perspective is due to differences in visual acuity and light-change tolerance among people. I've seen pieces of a lot of GW2 bosses. I've seen an arm here, a leg there. The bigger the model, the more of it I may have seen. @ Yuyuske: In Options, on the first tab there is a check box for Show Player Names. Having that unchecked helps a bit with the visual clutter.Tabula RasaConfirmed geezer. Oh man I just got nostalgic.

There are only 5 true Gods you heretic. I bet you also support peace with the Charr.

Well, maybe you are new in this game so you discovered the core game as a f2p game. But, if you don't know, in the beginning the core game was not f2p. It was a buy to play. And a major selling point was that no annoying things from other games will pollute it - one of that "bad" things was the "pay to win" aspect.Now, if what you say is true, I mean: "Mounts are not pay to win. They are part of the game which is buy to play. This has nothing to do with the free TRIAL people can chose to try out.", and taking into account the fact that lot of players bought the core game (more than 11 millions according to ANet) - that means for them the core is buy to play- it seems that ANet gave them all some mounts. Or is not so? HM? It seems your statement is a little bit inaccurate. The correct statement may be: "Mounts are not pay to win. They belong to a part of the game which is buy to play". Well, this is what OP said - the mounts have no place in Tyria. They belong to another part of the game. And about your free to play TRIAL obsession: I have nothing against the mounts in the expansion - this is what you bought. But in Tyria ... this damages the game experience for all the players who bought the vanilla GW2. Exactly this. I'm worried about this also.But it seems that the others are not. They bought the expansion to have an advantage over the others (but this is not pay to win). To keep this advantage they don't care about the future. Even if this is the future of the game they play. This.Again. Everyone assumes anyone playing core is on free account. Personally, if I could, I would go back to core only. I debated looking for an old physical copy of gw2 for sale. As I had mentioned before. Yes it is unfortunate that players who bought the game over 5 years ago are not able to use mounts. Then again, that's not something you paid for back then. You've gotten your moneys worth many times over. If you can't afford to invest the tiny amount of money GW2 requires, you might want to move away from MMOs entirely. I never said I disagree with you.

What about people who litetally only bought the core game. They are not f2p. Excelsior.They are pay2play actually, a different thing. Also, since you get the core game with HoT, basically a great bundle deal, which is available since 2 years, I think they are paid off already with a lot of gametime and should consider either leaving or spending a few bucks on it. If they bought the actual core game, they have access to the game for over 2.5years now, up to 5 years (!). Do you think players being here for 2.5 - 5 years stay in the freebie zone that long if they find the time and money worthwile spend?If I knew then what I know now, yes. Absolutely I would stay in core.

Well, maybe you are new in this game so you discovered the core game as a f2p game. But, if you don't know, in the beginning the core game was not f2p. It was a buy to play. And a major selling point was that no annoying things from other games will pollute it - one of that "bad" things was the "pay to win" aspect.Now, if what you say is true, I mean: "Mounts are not pay to win. They are part of the game which is buy to play. This has nothing to do with the free TRIAL people can chose to try out.", and taking into account the fact that lot of players bought the core game (more than 11 millions according to ANet) - that means for them the core is buy to play- it seems that ANet gave them all some mounts. Or is not so? HM? It seems your statement is a little bit inaccurate. The correct statement may be: "Mounts are not pay to win. They belong to a part of the game which is buy to play". Well, this is what OP said - the mounts have no place in Tyria. They belong to another part of the game. And about your free to play TRIAL obsession: I have nothing against the mounts in the expansion - this is what you bought. But in Tyria ... this damages the game experience for all the players who bought the vanilla GW2. Exactly this. I'm worried about this also.But it seems that the others are not. They bought the expansion to have an advantage over the others (but this is not pay to win). To keep this advantage they don't care about the future. Even if this is the future of the game they play. This.Again. Everyone assumes anyone playing core is on free account. Personally, if I could, I would go back to core only. I debated looking for an old physical copy of gw2 for sale.

What about people who litetally only bought the core game. They are not f2p.

With massive bonuses to stats when 50+ skirt are adjacent.